Packaging rule · European Union · EPR
Environmental Omnibus: suspension of PPWR authorised-representative obligation
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) rule covering all packaging in the European Union, set by European Commission. Proposed, not yet law.
The rule
Recorded from the official source named below. Rates and dates are as the source states them on the date it was consulted.
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Authority
- European Commission
- Rule type
- EPR
- Materials
- All packaging
- Status
- Proposed Proposed, not law
- Proposed
- 10 December 2025
From the source“The application of Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 shall be suspended until 1 January 2035.”
Official source EUR-Lex: Commission proposal COM(2025) 982 finalOfficial (government or regulator) · published 10 December 2025 · consulted 14 October 2026
Key dates
Proposed 10 months ago
Source published 10 months ago
Source consulted by the SPI team 1 day ago
Re-checked by a second SPI team member 1 day ago
Dates for a proposal are those in the text as proposed and may change before adoption.
What it means
SPI analysis Our reading of the official source above. Not legal advice; always rely on the official text.
SPI summary
Commission proposal COM(2025) 982 (Omnibus VIII, procedure 2025/0395(COD)) would suspend PPWR Article 45(3) until 1 January 2035, so EU-established producers selling packaging directly to end users in another Member State would not need to appoint an authorised representative for EPR. Parliament's ENVI committee voted on 5 October 2026 and tabled report A10-0266/2026 on 9 October 2026. Not yet adopted.
In practice
Under the PPWR, a producer selling packaging or packaged products directly to end users in another Member State is expected to appoint an authorised representative for EPR there (recital 123). Commission proposal COM(2025) 982 of 10 December 2025 would suspend Article 45(3) of the PPWR until 1 January 2035 for producers established in the EU. Until the proposal is adopted, the record and DG ENV indicate the obligation has applied since 12 August 2026, so cross-border e-commerce sellers and brand owners still need to plan for it.
Where the record is unclear
- Not yet adopted: the procedure 2025/0395(COD) shows a committee vote on 5 October 2026, a report tabled on 9 October 2026 and an indicative plenary date of 19 October 2026, with no Council position or agreement recorded.
- The final text may differ from the proposal; the Commission says it will engage with the co-legislators.
- How each Member State treats the obligation in practice before adoption was not checked.
Where it sits in the tracker
- One of 18 packaging rules we track in the European Union, of which 1 are EPR rules.
- In all, 25 EPR rules are tracked across 15 jurisdictions. Compare them below
Company profiles that map to this rule
Companies whose SPI profile lists this rule in its regulatory exposure, based on where they report selling. Not company-reported.
Overview
Commission proposal COM(2025) 982 of 10 December 2025, filed as Omnibus VIII on environmental legislation, would suspend Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 until 1 January 20351. Article 45(3) obliges a producer established in one Member State that makes packaging or packaged products available for the first time directly to end users in another Member State to appoint an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility there35. Article 1 of the proposal applies the same suspension to Article 56(3) of the Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/15421.
The Commission's case is cost. Recital 4 of the proposal points to the burden of appointing a representative in up to 26 Member States, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises. The proposal rests on Article 114 TFEU for packaging and Article 192(1) TFEU for batteries, and recital 9 says a wider EPR reform proposal is expected in 20261.
As proposed, appointing a representative would become optional for producers established in the Union, while the rules for third-country producers stay as they are13. On 14 October 2026 the proposal was awaiting Parliament's first-reading position2.
Who must do what
EU-established producer selling directly to end users in another Member State (as proposed)
Producer established outside the Union (as proposed)
- Expect each Member State either to require a written mandate for an authorised representative or to ensure traceability and enforcement by other means (Article 2, second paragraph)1.
Member States (as proposed)
- Where third-country producers are not required to appoint a representative, ensure traceability and enforcement through alternative means1.
Are you in scope?
Work through each question. The answers are the SPI team's reading of the sources cited.
Are you established in an EU Member State?
- If yes
- The proposed suspension would cover you1.
Do you first make packaging available directly to end users in another Member State?
- If yes
- That is the situation Article 45(3) addresses3.
- If no
- Article 45(3) does not reach you, with or without the proposal.
Has the proposal been adopted and published?
Do you also sell batteries by distance contract?
- If yes
- Article 1 suspends Article 56(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 on the same terms1.
- If no
- Only the packaging suspension is relevant.
Compliance checklist
Keep representatives in place
By Until adoptionSPI analysis of the official text. Not legal advice; confirm with the text or counsel. While the proposal is pending, keep existing appointments in each Member State where you sell directly to end users, because Article 45(3) has applied since 12 August 20264.
Evidence to keep Mandate list per Member State.
Follow the plenary vote
By 19 October 2026 (forecast)ENVI voted on 5 October 2026 and tabled report A10-0266/2026 on 9 October 2026; the plenary date is a forecast and no Council position was recorded2.
Evidence to keep Dated procedure watch entry.
Compare the final text
By On publicationCheck the adopted text against Article 2 of the proposal, since Parliament and Council can change dates or scope1.
Evidence to keep Comparison note with the publication reference.
Decide on voluntary representatives
By After entry into forceDecide per Member State whether to keep a representative voluntarily until 1 January 20351.
Evidence to keep Decision record per Member State.
Check national choices for non-EU entities
By After adoptionNon-EU group companies should check whether each Member State keeps the written mandate requirement or uses alternative means1.
Evidence to keep Country table of national choices.
Enforcement and penalties
- Who enforces
- National competent authorities for EPR (recital 115)5
- Powers
- Until adoption, authorities can apply Article 45(3) to EU-established distance sellers; once the suspension applies, they could no longer require the appointment from those sellers before 1 January 203515.
- Enforcement so far
- No case concerning Article 45(3) had surfaced by 14 October 2026.
As proposed, the measure creates no new penalty or obligation; it removes one obligation for a period1. Penalties for not appointing a representative under the current Article 45(3) are set in national law.
How it fits with other rules
- EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) applies PR-EU-001
The proposal suspends one paragraph of the parent Regulation's EPR rules. A direct seller remains the producer under Article 3(1)(15)(c) and (d) in the end user's Member State16. - Germany Packaging Law Implementation Act (VerpackDG) replaces VerpackG PR-DE-001
Germany's VerpackDG adapts national registration to the Regulation. If the suspension is adopted, German law could not require EU-based distance sellers to appoint a representative before 1 January 2035, because the suspension is directly applicable1. - Spain Royal Decree 1055/2022: packaging EPR and reuse targets PR-ES-002
Spain's EPR scheme is another national system where cross-border sellers register; the suspension would change who must act for them there, not whether they register1.
History of the rule
Single Market Strategy identifies EPR complexity as a frequent barrier for companies1.
Commission adopts proposal COM(2025) 9821.
Referral to the ENVI committee announced in plenary2.
European Economic and Social Committee opinion2.
Article 45(3) starts to apply with the rest of the Regulation4.
ENVI committee vote, first reading2.
Committee report A10-0266/2026 tabled2.
Today
Indicative plenary sitting for the first-reading vote2.
Proposed end of the suspension1.
Questions
Is the PPWR authorised representative obligation suspended?
Who would benefit from the suspension?
Producers established in an EU Member State that sell packaging or packaged products directly to end users in another Member State. The Commission says they may otherwise need representatives in up to 26 Member States1.
Does the suspension cover non-EU sellers?
No. Under Article 2 of the proposal, Member States may still require third-country producers to appoint an authorised representative by written mandate, or ensure traceability and enforcement by other means1.
When would the suspension take effect?
Does the proposal also affect batteries?
Yes. Article 1 suspends Article 56(3) of the Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 until 1 January 2035 for EU-established producers selling batteries by distance contract to end users in other Member States1.
Definitions
- Producer
- Defined in EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) applies PR-EU-001
- Making available on the market
- Defined in EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) applies PR-EU-001
Sources for this analysis
- EUR-Lex: Commission proposal COM(2025) 982 final (Omnibus VIII) Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
- European Parliament Legislative Observatory: procedure file 2025/0395(COD) Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
- European Parliament Legislative Observatory: summary of COM(2025) 982 Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
- European Commission (DG ENV): Packaging waste Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
- EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2025/40, OJ L 22.1.2025 Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
- EUR-Lex: Commission Notice C/2026/3084, Guidance document for Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ C, 10.6.2026) Official · Consulted 14 October 2026
Written by the SPI team on 14 October 2026. Sources checked as of 14 October 2026. SPI analysis, not legal advice; always rely on the official text.
Change history
Verified: a second SPI team member re-checked every fact above against the source on 14 October 2026. Any later change to the facts sends the rule back to Sourced and is logged here.
Verified by a second SPI team member
Changed: SPI summary, rate note, source, source link, source date, quote
Verified by a second SPI team member
Changed: SPI summary
Added to the tracker
Spotted an error? Write to sales@strategicpackaginginsights.com quoting PR-EU-012 and the source. Corrections are logged in this history.
EPR rules elsewhere
The same type of rule for the same materials in other jurisdictions, by the date it applies.
Ask the SPI team
Does this rule apply to your packs?
Tell us your products, materials and markets. An analyst maps the obligations, fees and deadlines that apply, with every source.
Prefer email? Write to sales@strategicpackaginginsights.com.
- Q1
Which packaging rules apply to us in each market we sell in?
We map each market's EPR, tax, ban, recycled-content, labelling and deposit rules against your materials and formats, and show which are in force, adopted or only proposed.
- Q2
What could EPR fees and plastic taxes cost us next year?
We apply published fee tables and tax rates to your tonnages and recycled content, and show the result as scenarios with every rate sourced.
- Q3
Can you tell us when a rule changes?
Yes. The free tracker alerts cover rule changes by country; a monitoring retainer adds monthly notes on what the changes mean for your portfolio.